Posted by
Tzimisce on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:27:12 PM
Gore won the Nobel Prize - was anyone really surprised? I fail to see what Global Warming has to do with promoting peace though. Yeah I'm sure a few on the left could explain it in a round about way claiming "hot temperatures make hot heads" or some nonsense like that.
If you tell them that Islam is a religion rooted in violence, the libs will argue with you (despite all the evidence that yes, Islam and bloodshed seem to go hand in hand.) But these same people can see a link between peace and hot weather.
I guess none of us should really be surprised. After all, there is no real evidence of global warming. That's why the libs are so desperate for "consensus science". Of course, that doesn't cover the mistakes and outright lies of the Greens. Isn't it interesting that on the eve of Gore's win a judge in the UK ruled that the movie " An Inconvenient Truth" have a disclaimer before being shown to school children. Among the falsehoods is the claim that Global Warming caused Katrina (as opposed to 100 years of liberal Democrat mismanagement of New Orleans.) That one has to be the most stinging though, since " An Inconvenient Truth" features a picture of Katrina on the movie box.
But I'm digressing. If you want to win the Nobel Prize all you have to be is #1) A Bush Hater, #2) White, #3) Rich and #4) Espouse a left wing dogma.
Oh you don't think so? Take a look at past winners: Jimmy Carter, Yassir Arafat, Koffi Annon - Koffi Annon, the guy who while in charge of the UN knowingly broke the UN's own trade embargo on Iraq making millions of dollars while Iraqi civilians died of starvation and sickness is a Nobel Prize winner.
I also notice that a lot of the Literary winners always seem to write about left wing interests: How racist, sexist, homophobic Western society is. How the working people are constantly getting screwed by the rich. Isn't it interesting that a lot of these particular winners tend to be white, from well to do families and have good jobs at Universities where they're overpaid for the nothing they produce?
Yeah I know - you're not a part of the problem because you care. I'm just a bigoted, racist, sexist, homophobe that you're attacking.
The libs tell us that war is caused by poor people trying to make a better lot for themselves. War is about the "disenfranchised" trying to cast off the shackles of oppression from the evil white man.
Question: how is Gore's Global Warming going to help any of this?
People in India and China are starving because there is not enough food. The way to produce more food is to modernize: use tractors, elaborate irrigation methods, fertilizers, pesticides, etc. Every single one of these things Gore is opposed to because it will alter the environment. Furthermore, Gore (and the IPCC) are basically a bunch of white guys using their power and authority to tell a bunch of brown people how to live. It might not be "colonization", but it's still status quo of colonization dragging on.
Next year instead of screwing around, they should give the Nobel Prize to a man who really deserves it, a man who is peaceful and stands up for the oppressed lower classes: Osama bin Laden.
Osama has it all: brown skin, minority status, hates the United States. He's perfect.
Maybe next year (maybe.)